ADSM-L

Re: ANR5958E SVM is at level 46, .... unable to continue.

1994-05-26 15:39:42
Subject: Re: ANR5958E SVM is at level 46, .... unable to continue.
From: "Steven P. Roder" <TKSSTEVE AT UBVM.CC.BUFFALO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 26 May 1994 15:39:42 EDT
On Fri, 20 May 1994 13:13:54 PDT Joseph A. Faracchio said:
>If you are not using SES/E and you bump up to the latest / greatest
>VM Server ptf then be sure to order the latest / greatest SVM stuff too.
>
>I got momentarily 'burned' by this.  Had to do a quick restore of my
>servers 192/program disk using VMBACKUP (do you really want ADSM backup CMS?)
>when I saw this.
>
>I consider this part of the fallout of OCO / Shotgun maintenance mode we've
>not come to live with.  ... sigh ...
>
>.. joe.f.
>P.S>   Would SES/E have stopped me from this foible????
Yes!  With SES, the PTF(s) not applied to the SVM code would be flagged
as co-reqs for the maintenance you are applying to the ADSM Server.  I
am an ESA 1.2.1 shop, and know from experience that this works ;-)


Steve
(tkssteve AT ubvm.cc.buffalo DOT edu | [email protected] | (716)645-3564)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>