Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*wrong\s+subnetmask\s+after\s+discovery\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*wrong\s+subnetmask\s+after\s+discovery\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. wrong subnetmask after discovery (score: 1): Author: Kammerstetter Bernhard <kmt AT ATIBM1.SOFTLAB.CO DOT AT>; Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 11:23:58 +0200; Hello outhere in netland, after a pretty nice installation of TME 10 Framework and NetView V5.0 a confusing situation after the automitic discovery occured: The NetView-Server machine, a node on a RS; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1998-06/msg00347.html (10,911 bytes)
2. Re: wrong subnetmask after discovery (score: 1): Author: Ray Schafer <schafer AT TKG DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 15:21:24 -0400; The 10 network is because this is a class A address. The netmask is a netmask of a class A network. My guess is that snmp is incorrectly configured on the server. Try doing an snmpwalk $(hostname). I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1998-06/msg00362.html (12,344 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]