Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tapetape\s+$not\s+in\s+faq\-o\-matic$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tapetape\s+$not\s+in\s+faq\-o\-matic$\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:55:46 -0400; Does anyone have the tape type for the LTO3 (Quantum) ? Are there any other parameters I should tweak to get better performance/utilization ? This is still a reasonable default ? tapebufs 20 I am run; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00351.html (11,977 bytes)
2. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Pavel Pragin <ppragin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:22:02 -0700; Does anyone have the tape type for the LTO3 (Quantum) ? Are there any other parameters I should tweak to get better performance/utilization ? This is still a reasonable default ? tapebufs 20 I am ru; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00352.html (12,419 bytes)
3. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:39:08 -0400 (EDT); Does anyone have the tape type for the LTO3 (Quantum) ? This is what I use: define tapetype LTO3comp { length 420000 mbytes blocksize 2048 filemark 5577 kbytes speed 60000 kps lbl-templ "3hole.ps" }; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00354.html (14,059 bytes)
4. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:40:02 -0400; A tapetype run on an lto-3 drive without a good estimate option might take about 14 days to complete :( -- Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Pri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00355.html (12,647 bytes)
5. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Pavel Pragin <ppragin AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:51:11 -0700; Does anyone have the tape type for the LTO3 (Quantum) ? Are there any other parameters I should tweak to get better performance/utilization ? This is still a reasonable default ? tapebufs 20 I am ru; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00356.html (12,949 bytes)
6. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:15:03 +0200; Does anyone have the tape type for the LTO3 (Quantum) ? Try using this command to determine tapetype: amtapetype -f /dev/nst0 (/dev/nst0) will be diff for solaris i think When pointing people to thi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00361.html (13,486 bytes)
7. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:57:37 -0400; Jon, That may explain why this was STILL running when I came in this morning. Tue May 23 16:09:49 EDT 2006 Writing 2048 Mbyte compresseable data: 33 sec Writing 2048 Mbyte uncompresseable data: 33 se; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00364.html (15,266 bytes)
8. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:54:34 -0400; Paul, The -e made a huge difference in runtime. For what its worth, here is the result I received. Wed May 24 09:23:58 EDT 2006 Writing 2048 Mbyte compresseable data: 33 sec Writing 2048 Mbyte uncomp; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00374.html (14,488 bytes)
9. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 19:25:46 -0400; If like my ultrium 1, the block count will be exactly the same, but the speed will be slower. -- Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00375.html (12,962 bytes)
10. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:49:47 -0400; Jon, You are right, largely the same, run time of 3h 38 min and the speed was a little lower, but only by about 1%, but I don't know enough about the amtapetype and maybe the pattern of the data writ; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00378.html (13,942 bytes)
11. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:33:48 -0400; Well, actually a little different. I got my Ultrium 1 from ebay and like a kid with a new toy ran several tapetypes on it. Three different physical tapes (two brands), one two times, and with 3 diffe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00381.html (15,092 bytes)
12. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:44:08 -0400; Jon, Actually I'm now wondering how to keep the drive busy, what can be done to feed it better. I'm pretty sure I'm going to need a second work area as I add partitions but disk to tape speed might b; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00382.html (13,699 bytes)
13. Re: tapetape (not in faq-o-matic) (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:14:38 -0400 (EDT); slow for this drive. I just have to perform a number of dumps and check the actual speed if its below the shoe-shine limit... what is that for this drive anyway, with the noise in my computer room I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-05/msg00384.html (12,689 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]