Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*suggestion\s+for\s+a\s+disk\-to\-disk\s+backup\s+server\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:48:59 -0400
ok, tried this over the preceding weekend. the amanda user's crontab has these entries: 0 15 * * 1-5 /usr/local/sbin/amcheck -m daily 45 0 * * 2-6 /usr/local/sbin/amdump daily 45 0 * * 0-1 /usr/loca
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00008.html (14,568 bytes)

2. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:47:20 -0400
Maybe an additional possibility: 5. /dev/rmt/0n == /dev/rmt/1n I think by tapedev=/no/such/tape Paul meant that literally, or at least some string that could not be a legit tape device. Two ways I ca
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00009.html (16,157 bytes)

3. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:44:55 -0400
/dev/rmt/0n is actually my internal dds/3 drive. It exists and works, but does not have a tape in it. I've used it recently to do some tests of the behavior of ufsdump for incremental recoveries (che
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00010.html (17,812 bytes)

4. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:33:31 +0700 (ICT)
Not speaking for Paul, but I guess he did. I was looking the same direction, in fact I could not see any place where Amanda logs the tape device she is going to use. The only bits that would log the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00014.html (13,184 bytes)

5. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:46:13 -0500
Folks -- I looked into this '-o' question, and have some answers for you. The documentation could use some help there, for sure. FWIW, it doesn't seem that comma-separated options are supported, from
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00027.html (13,645 bytes)

6. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:35:21 -0400
Thanks, Dustin. I set that up in crontab yesterday and it ran this morning. Worked. 45 0 * * 2-6 /usr/local/sbin/amdump daily -o reserve=100 -o tapedev=/dev/rmt/0n -o tpchanger="" Now, I'll change th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00036.html (16,512 bytes)

7. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:45:54 -0500
Yes, I think there would be demand for that (there are a lot of application-specific things that could use better backups). And yes, it will be a lot easier after the Application API is in place :) T
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00037.html (14,578 bytes)

8. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 09:28:57 +0700 (ICT)
Another advantage of maildir format over mailbox :) Only one message per file and no need for locking :) OK, I am still using mailbox, but I will change that :) An idea for the next release of Amand
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00043.html (14,401 bytes)

9. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bijnens <Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:15:34 +0200
I frequently use chg-multi, with 2 physical drives, or with several vtape-devices. Which the "the" device in that case? -- Paul Bijnens, xplanation Technology Services Tel +32 16 397.511 Technologiel
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-07/msg00044.html (13,443 bytes)

10. suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: "Rudy Setiawan" <rudal999 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 23:43:26 -0700
Hi all, I am trying to create backup servers out of the following specs: P4 3.0Ghz 1GB RAM RAID0 - 750GB x 2 (SATA) Hosts to backup: about 20 hosts with roughly 100GB each host. What will be the comp
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00169.html (11,940 bytes)

11. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:49:59 +0700 (ICT)
So you have 20*100= 2TB to backup on 750GB Limitation is clear, you deon't have enough backup space. Increase your backup space. Olivier
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00170.html (12,095 bytes)

12. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:08:40 +0700 (ICT)
My mistake, you have 1.5 TG of backup space. You still have less backup space than disks to backup. Oli vier
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00173.html (12,525 bytes)

13. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: "Rudy Setiawan" <rudal999 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:16:15 -0700
Yes I do understand that and I didnt mention the number of backup servers. Is it a recommendation of 1.5TB (raid-0 750x2) to backup the maximum of 10 to 12 hosts? or will that be too much of a backup
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00174.html (13,499 bytes)

14. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:22:30 +0700 (ICT)
In fact compression depends on your data, do you know how much they compress? Full/incr depends on your data, how your disks are full, how much data you need to do incr every day? Try to use the rev
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00176.html (12,747 bytes)

15. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Cyrille Bollu <Cyrille.Bollu AT fedasil DOT be>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:46:41 +0200
owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org a écrit sur 25/06/2007 08:49:59 : In RAID0 750GB x 2 = 1,5TB But still that isn't enough. I would suggest you to buy something that could gives you up to 5TB at l
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00177.html (13,670 bytes)

16. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Matt Hyclak <hyclak AT math.ohiou DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:25:25 -0400
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 11:43:26PM -0700, Rudy Setiawan enlightened us: You realize that by using RAID 0, you are doubling the chance of losing all of your backups, because there is NO redundancy - s
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00178.html (13,824 bytes)

17. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Marc Muehlfeld <Marc.Muehlfeld AT medizinische-genetik DOT de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:46:47 +0200
Cyrille Bollu schrieb: RAID0 - 750GB x 2 (SATA) Sure you want to do a backup to a Raid0? When one disk crash, you ll loos the data. Here I use a Raid6 Array out of 15 320 GB Sata2 disks + 1 hotspare.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00179.html (14,047 bytes)

18. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Reitsma <reitsma AT denison DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:24:50 -0400
In addition to doing everything to make sure a backup disk failure does not destroy all your backups you need to take into consideration the length of your cycle. My experience so far has been with t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00180.html (15,635 bytes)

19. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:43:50 -0400
Ok, I'm hijacking a thread. Sorry about that. But, really, it does fit in. I just tried something this weekend, and the above comment may be the root of why what I tried didn't work the way I had hop
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00181.html (14,945 bytes)

20. Re: suggestion for a disk-to-disk backup server (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:59:39 -0400
ufsdump might have been able to figure out from which date to do the incremental, `IF' it had been asked to do an incremental. However, as this was a new config, amanda "knew" there had never been a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2007-06/msg00182.html (13,668 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu