Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*strange\s+dump\s+sizes\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. strange dump sizes (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:39:08 -0400
I'm getting dumps that are the same size regardless of dump level. Happening on all clients, all DLEs. The file's timestamps (mtime and ctime) and inode nums are not changing, which could cause them
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-06/msg00022.html (11,784 bytes)

2. Re: strange dump sizes (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:10:10 +0200
Jon LaBadie schreef: I'm getting dumps that are the same size regardless of dump level. Happening on all clients, all DLEs. The file's timestamps (mtime and ctime) and inode nums are not changing, wh
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-06/msg00025.html (13,324 bytes)

3. Re: strange dump sizes (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:25:11 -0400
That is good to know, I never looked at the gnutar-list directory before. But I considered permissions. Look alright to me: $ ls -la total 3728 drwxr-xr-x 2 amandabackup disk 4096 Jun 2 04:37 . drwxr
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-06/msg00028.html (13,913 bytes)

4. Re: strange dump sizes (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:45:01 -0400
<snip> ... Following up to my own reply: I checked the most recent debug files and they show the "*.new" files are being used. For example, corresponding to the last listing above, two lines from sen
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-06/msg00029.html (13,330 bytes)

5. Re: strange dump sizes (score: 1)
Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:28:40 -0400
I checked the most recent debug files and they show the "*.new" files are being used. For example, corresponding to the last listing above, two lines from sendbackup...debug: sendbackup-gnutar: time
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-06/msg00031.html (12,223 bytes)

6. Re: strange dump sizes (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:46:57 -0400
Nothing about failure to rename, just failure to open the *_0 file. Here is a section from one of the clients. sendbackup: time 0.005: got all connections sendbackup: time 0.006: spawning /usr/bin/gz
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-06/msg00033.html (14,279 bytes)

7. Re: strange dump sizes (score: 1)
Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 11:22:16 -0400
Jon LaBadie wrote: On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 08:28:40PM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: Jon LaBadie wrote: Following up to my own reply: I checked the most recent debug files and they show the "*.ne
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-06/msg00039.html (14,933 bytes)

8. Re: strange dump sizes (score: 1)
Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 12:38:37 -0400
I noted it was a "section" of the file. I'm unable to relocate the file my sample above was from. But in a nearly identical file (and many others) there were two more lines. No "parsed backup message
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-06/msg00040.html (15,905 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu