Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*snmpCollect\s+counter\s+wrapping\s+$was\s+Better\s+Graphing\s+tools\s+for\s+Netview$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*snmpCollect\s+counter\s+wrapping\s+$was\s+Better\s+Graphing\s+tools\s+for\s+Netview$\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: snmpCollect counter wrapping (was Better Graphing tools for Netview) (score: 1): Author: "Leslie Clark" <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:06:01 -0500; All it is doing, as I understand it, is noting that the current value is less than the last value, therefore it must have wrapped, OR been reset by the operator. It does not presume to know what the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2000-11/msg00489.html (15,335 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]