Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*size\s+of\s+active\s+vs\.\s+inactive\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: Mike <mikee AT MIKEE.ATH DOT CX>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:24:53 -0600
Given a tape library and multiple different policies for data storage, is there a simple (resource non-intensive) way to tell how much storage (the size of) active files and how much storage is used
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00791.html (11,423 bytes)

2. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: asr AT UFL DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:07:16 -0500
I think the only way you'll be able to do this is via a rather long-running select. You might get some value out of doing your select one node at a time, that will decrease the database blockages inf
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00793.html (11,784 bytes)

3. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:12:15 -0500
Given a tape library and multiple different policies for data storage, is there a simple (resource non-intensive) way to tell how much storage (the size of) active files and how much storage is used
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00794.html (11,882 bytes)

4. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Boyer <bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:05:43 -0500
It has also been discussed several times that TSM doesn't appear to be a good fit for a VTL. May want to search the archives to find out more on the subject. Bill Boyer "Life is not about how fast yo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00796.html (12,457 bytes)

5. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: David E Ehresman <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:42:10 -0500
a good fit for a VTL. May want to search the archives to find out more on the subject.<< Has anyone heard of good experiences with TSM on a virtual tape library? Can this ever be a good thing?
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00804.html (11,372 bytes)

6. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: Curtis Stewart <Curtis.Stewart AT LAWSON DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:52:20 -0600
My $0.02. I guess if you are doing a whole bunch of LAN Free stuff or NDMP backups it can be nice since you can just define the drives as you need them and not worry too much about drive contention (
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00805.html (12,739 bytes)

7. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: "Johnson, Milton" <milton.johnson AT CITIGROUP DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:58:30 -0500
We have been using a VTL for 3-4 months and we consider it a success. Environment: -- -- * OS: AIX 4330-11 * TSM: Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.7 * Physical Library: Single frame 3494 w/2 3590E1A Dri
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00835.html (15,090 bytes)

8. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:36:27 -0500
...Needless to say, I disagree with the statement that TSM doesn't appear to be a good fit for a VTL. Remember a VTL is just a library that can mount/unmount a tape in less than one second and read/
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00837.html (12,278 bytes)

9. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:09:17 -0500
A lot of the earlier discussions on the list were related to the IBM 3494 VTL, which was designed for handling small chunks of seldom-used sequential data. It is prone to performance issues when hand
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00839.html (14,418 bytes)

10. Re: size of active vs. inactive? (score: 1)
Author: "Johnson, Milton" <milton.johnson AT CITIGROUP DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:06:12 -0500
I agree with your comments and yes if your server/client can stream data fast enough to the tape drive you may be able to out-pace a disk drive. If you can not keep up with the tape drive then you ca
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-11/msg00842.html (13,011 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu