Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sending\s+trap\s+as\s+TEC\s+event\s+w\/o\s+using\s+ruleset\-\-example\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sending\s+trap\s+as\s+TEC\s+event\s+w\/o\s+using\s+ruleset\-\-example\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: netview AT toddh DOT net (Todd H.); Date: 15 Oct 2001 17:09:00 -0500; Greetings, I'd like to eliminate some branches from my correlation rulesets--for example, sending a TEC event in response to a simple trap. Hertofore, I've done this with "trap settings" nodes follow; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00138.html (12,844 bytes)
2. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: Jane Curry <jane.curry AT skills-1st.co DOT uk>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:46:46 +0100; Hi Todd, I love Leslie's suggestion to create your own source letter and then have a simple ruleset that forwards to TEC based on that. Do you know that you can create rulesets of rulesets? Rather th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00142.html (15,285 bytes)
3. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: netview AT toddh DOT net (Todd H.); Date: 17 Oct 2001 01:05:06 -0500; Unless I'm missing some hidden functionality--this is what we do today I think. We develop a branch/related branches in its own ruleset for testing, then merge it (File>Import) with our production ru; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00152.html (15,169 bytes)
4. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: "James Shanks" <SHANKS AT us.tivoli DOT com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 05:42:38 -0400; Help me out here, Todd. You keep complaining bitterly about the ruleset editor and rulesets in general, and yet the GUI feature is one which most users prefer. We won awards for it, and it is the mos; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00153.html (12,714 bytes)
5. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Hochstetler" <shochste AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:23:16 -0500; You can easily run multiple rulesets. You can create a very small ruleset using Leslie's great idea and activate it using the "TEC Adapter". You can create additional rulesets and activate all of the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00157.html (12,201 bytes)
6. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: netview AT toddh DOT net (Todd H.); Date: 18 Oct 2001 13:50:54 -0500; Choices are good things. If you're a single netview administrator only having to worry about your one netview server, that's one thing. If you're a development organization supporting multiple locati; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00202.html (15,035 bytes)
7. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: netview AT toddh DOT net (Todd H.); Date: 18 Oct 2001 13:53:55 -0500; This sounds appealing...but how does this "small ruleset" get the output from the multiple other rulesets? Or is there some functionality of the ruleset editor that I'm missing? All I'm aware of it t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00203.html (12,497 bytes)
8. RE: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:10:46 -0500; Be aware that using multiple rulesets has a down side as well. First, if you use any kind of query or trap settings node, you incur multiple queries each time the next ruleset is started. use 4 rules; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00208.html (13,326 bytes)
9. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Hochstetler" <shochste AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:05:41 -0500; Todd, there are "best practices", James may actually say "rules" to follow when writing rulesets. 1. If you need the output of a rule to feed another rule, then the output should be an action that cr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00212.html (14,277 bytes)
10. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: "James Shanks" <SHANKS AT us.tivoli DOT com>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:01:48 -0400; Todd - I almost hesitate to respond because you are already so bitter about this, I don't think you are willing to accept an opposing point of view. But I will try to answer your concerns as best as; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00218.html (18,736 bytes)
11. Re: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example? (score: 1): Author: Jane Curry <jane.curry AT skills-1st.co DOT uk>; Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:11:11 +0100; Todd, One other thought on this you may or may not like. Although I have never seen any documentation on it, you can edit your tecint.conf TEC adapter file and add standard TEC filter stanzas. This i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2001-10/msg00225.html (12,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]