Author: "Walter, Jeannine" <Jeannine_Walter AT PURINA-MILLS DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 14:51:34 -0600
This is one of those duh questions but here goes anyway. I want to run reclamation of our off-site tapes during the day from 9AM until 4PM. How do I do this? By a script that runs as an admin schedul
Author: Trevor Foley <Trevor.Foley AT BTFINANCIALGROUP DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:31:29 +1100
Hi Jeannine, Set up 2 ADSM administrative schedules, one at 9am that enables reclaimation for the offsite pool (update stgpool stgpool-name recl=??) and the other for 4pm that disables reclaimation (
Author: Walter, Jeannine [mailto:Jeannine_Walter AT PURINA-MILLS DOT COM]
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:32:29 -0500
This is one of those duh questions but here goes anyway. I want to run reclamation of our off-site tapes during the day from 9AM until 4PM. How do I do this? By a script that runs as an admin schedul
Author: Joe Faracchio <brother AT SOCRATES.BERKELEY DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 16:19:24 -0800
The behaviour I've seen says that it can go for a longer time than just 9-5 if you set the number too low or too "into" the chain. Especially if the number chosen is not the tape with the most to be
Author: Eric Winters <ewinters AT AU1.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:54:27 +1100
My experience of the reclamation of off-site volumes doesn't quite match up with my understanding of how it should work. Perhaps someone can shed some light on what's really going on. I'm starting re
Author: Gary Ison <Gary.Ison AT MAIL.STATE.KY DOT US>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:17:54 -0500
Eric, I am not by any means sure of my understanding either but here goes. Reclamation is an internal, "hidden", process which is triggered automatically on an hourly cycle. Apparently, it is interna
My experience of the reclamation of off-site volumes doesn't quite match up with my understanding of how it should work. Perhaps someone can shed some light on what's really going on. I'm starting re
Author: "Marian L. Dalton" <marian.dalton AT CMPCO DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:54:12 -0500
I have found that quite regularly the first time through a reclaim process for offsite volumes a small percentage of them will not be completely reclaimed. If you look at the percentage used on the r
Author: Eric Winters <ewinters AT AU1.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 09:06:22 +1100
Gary, It's important to distinguish between onsite and offsite volume reclamation. The onsite ones are reclaimed as you describe. The current volume is reclaimed, the current reclaim value is checked
Author: Gary Ison <Gary.Ison AT MAIL.STATE.KY DOT US>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:24:29 -0500
Eric, Sorry about the delay in replying; it's been a busy day with TSM. Thanks for the clarification on reclamation. In a weird way, it kind of makes sense that offsite volumes should be reclaimed mo
Author: Eric Winters [SMTP:ewinters AT AU1.IBM DOT COM]
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:32:29 -0500
Gary, It's important to distinguish between onsite and offsite volume reclamation. The onsite ones are reclaimed as you describe. The current volume is reclaimed, the current reclaim value is checked
I think that logic suggests that an offsite volume with a spanning file will be reclaimed and that file will be completely written to the new offsite volume being created. The "half" file left on som
Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:32:29 -0500
Eric, Sorry about the delay in replying; it's been a busy day with TSM. Thanks for the clarification on reclamation. In a weird way, it kind of makes sense that offsite volumes should be reclaimed mo