Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*object\s+in\s+ovwdb\s+but\s+not\s+on\s+the\s+map\s+$was\s+no\s+subject$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*object\s+in\s+ovwdb\s+but\s+not\s+on\s+the\s+map\s+$was\s+no\s+subject$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: object in ovwdb but not on the map (was no subject) (score: 1): Author: James Shanks <James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 08:25:35 -0500; First, ovtopofix, as the name implies, and as the man page will tell you, is used primarily to synchronize the topology database with the map database, and it only does very limited things with the o; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-12/msg00435.html (13,700 bytes)
2. Re: object in ovwdb but not on the map (was no subject) (score: 1): Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:14:24 -0500; If ovtopofix does not remove it, it must have more than just the first two fields. Sometimes that happens when another product adds certain kinds of fields to a node, and then you delete the node usi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-12/msg00439.html (14,857 bytes)
3. Re: object in ovwdb but not on the map (was no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Boulieris, Arthur" <Arthur.Boulieris AT NZ.UNISYS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:17:19 -0600; Thanks for all your replies guys, I tried all suggested things but in the end it was a full backup and the ovtopofix -r that got the little sucker. There is now no trace the object and netview seems; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-12/msg00450.html (15,375 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]