- 1. networking and adsm (score: 1)
- Author: Cindy Cannam <CCannam AT GENAM DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 11:41:35 -0600
- To all ADSMers: Just out of curiosity, how many of you folks are experiencing dreadful (and I mean really horrible) network transfer rates for normal incrementals from your ADSM client nodes to your
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-01/msg00696.html (11,731 bytes)
- 2. Re: networking and adsm (score: 1)
- Author: "McGrew, Perry" <pmcgrew AT AGWAY DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:41:01 -0500
- Cindy, We are in the midst of ATM & ADSM implementation too. We are running OS/390 1.3, TCP/IP 3.2, ADSM/MVS V3 and have V3 Clients on our AIX, Novell and HP-UX machines. We just installed an IBM 826
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-01/msg00734.html (14,112 bytes)
- 3. Re: networking and adsm (score: 1)
- Author: Cindy Cannam <CCannam AT GENAM DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 16:33:53 -0600
- Perry: Thanks for the info -- I've passed this along to the technical support folks who will be most interested in the MVS TCP/IP stack and multiple processor info, among other things. I also sat wit
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-01/msg00751.html (15,657 bytes)
- 4. Re: networking and adsm (score: 1)
- Author: "Prather, Wanda" <PrathW1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 11:33:13 -0500
- Cindy, We run ADSM V2 for AIX on an RS6000 J30, 16 Mb Token ring with Cisco routers. I don't know anything about the routers, so I'm not sure what is or isn't comparable. Also, our slowest clients ar
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-01/msg00763.html (12,974 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu