Author: Rob Napholz <tel1rxn AT NJCMAIL.UPS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:18:58 -0400
Has any one seen these traps before this is a small sample of ~2400 traps from yesterday from trapd. 935564096 7 Wed Aug 25 02:54:56 1999 <none> n netmon-related Application connected to trapd. 93556
Author: James Shanks <James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:05:51 -0400
What else happens at about this time? Are these always back-to-back in the trapd log? Have you tried formatting the nettl logs to look for errors? What options are you running on trapd? Are you havin
Author: Rob Napholz <tel1rxn AT NJCMAIL.UPS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:23:38 -0400
I was just looking at the trapd.log and noticed them (this goes back to the mlm node up/down event) 935604947 7 Wed Aug 25 14:15:47 1999 <none> d netmon-related Application connected to trapd. 935604
Author: James Shanks <James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 17:03:15 -0400
So are you seeing any intervening messages/traps between the "connected" and "disconnected" ones? Notice that the event command lists the source as "d" for "demo". The ones you mentioned before had t
Those entries are from demandpolls, I think (the d ). That will generate an event, I believe. If you unmanage/manage a node, you will get an Up event (if it is up). Could that be it? If you issue the
I would say someone is doing a demand-poll. Is there a trap in between the sets you show? Mark Sklenarik Tivoli NetView Product Integrity Has any one seen these traps before this is a small sample of