- 1. Re: mediawait (score: 1)
- Author: Simon Watson <simon.s.watson AT SHELL.COM DOT BN>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:32:47 +0800
- I expect they are waiting on the same tape. The client name is the same so this is quite possible. Have a look at q sess f=d to see if it is waiting for a mount point or a specific tape. Regards, Sim
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-08/msg00732.html (11,733 bytes)
- 2. Re: mediawait (score: 1)
- Author: Reinhold Wagner <rwagner AT ZEUNASTAERKER DOT DE>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:57:49 +0200
- Rainer, device class was defined: Mount Limit DRIVES 2 minutes ago i started another backup and now two drives are used (2 sessions defined in the client's opt file - so 2 drives are correct) Maybe i
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-08/msg00749.html (10,913 bytes)
- 3. Re: mediawait (score: 1)
- Author: bbullock <bbullock AT MICRON DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 08:58:14 -0600
- I also think they are looking for the same tape. Do a 'q sess f=d' and see what tape it is waiting for. If it is the same tape then I'll bet that the tape storagepool is collocated. The order that a
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-08/msg00763.html (14,444 bytes)
- 4. Re: mediawait (score: 1)
- Author: Reinhold Wagner <rwagner AT ZEUNASTAERKER DOT DE>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 23:41:45 +0200
- Collocation was really enabled on this pool. It was a good idea! Thanks Reinhold Wagner, Zeuna Staerker GmbH & Co. KG
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-08/msg00764.html (10,335 bytes)
- 5. Re: mediawait (score: 1)
- Author: Rodrigo Cordovil Gazzaneo <rgazzaneo AT INFOLINK.COM DOT BR>
- Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 11:05:59 EST
- Increase your number of processes to the number of drives you want to use.
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-08/msg00786.html (11,417 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu