- 1. larger ADSM clients (score: 1)
- Author: "CANNAM, CYNTHIA L (SBCSI)" <CC5657 AT MOMAIL.SBC DOT COM>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:40:38 -0600
- To all: I have two very large (nearing 1 TB each) HP boxes that are really giving the network fits these days. Although there are other equally large HP and other platform clients in our environment
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01073.html (11,554 bytes)
- 2. Re: larger ADSM clients (score: 1)
- Author: Joel Fuhrman <joelf AT CAC.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:30:00 -0800
- Here are the non-default settings which I use on AIX: /usr/sbin/no -o rfc1323=1 /usr/sbin/no -o sb_max=524288 /usr/sbin/no -o tcp_mssdflt=4096 /usr/sbin/no -o tcp_sendspace=131072 /usr/sbin/no -o tcp
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01084.html (12,533 bytes)
- 3. Re: larger ADSM clients (score: 1)
- Author: "CANNAM, CYNTHIA L (SBCSI)" <CC5657 AT MOMAIL.SBC DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 08:18:50 -0600
- Thanks for the info -- I'm going to find a copy of the performance tuning manual (most recent edition) and see what goodies it may provide. I can then pass the data along to the network folks. Cindy
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01110.html (11,081 bytes)
- 4. Re: larger ADSM clients (score: 1)
- Author: Joel Fuhrman [mailto:joelf AT CAC.WASHINGTON DOT EDU]
- Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:33:43 -0500
- Here are the non-default settings which I use on AIX: /usr/sbin/no -o rfc1323=1 /usr/sbin/no -o sb_max=524288 /usr/sbin/no -o tcp_mssdflt=4096 /usr/sbin/no -o tcp_sendspace=131072 /usr/sbin/no -o tcp
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01111.html (12,478 bytes)
- 5. Re: larger ADSM clients (score: 1)
- Author: Tab Trepagnier <Tab.Trepagnier AT LAITRAM DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:01:18 -0600
- Cynthia, We fought the same issue. We had servers whose network connection was "100 Mbs" all the way to the ADSM server backing up at speeds that looked that there was a modem in the middle of the ch
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01166.html (12,484 bytes)
- 6. Re: larger ADSM clients (score: 1)
- Author: Charlotte Brooks <lotti AT US.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:53:47 -0800
- Cindy, I agree with Tab's comments. The first thing to do is determine if it is a general connection problem or a specific ADSM/TSM problem. The quickest way to do this is ftp some large files from y
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01188.html (11,385 bytes)
- 7. Re: larger ADSM clients (score: 1)
- Author: "CANNAM, CYNTHIA L (SBCSI)" <CC5657 AT MOMAIL.SBC DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:12:09 -0600
- Thanks to all who've responded. I do believe that the problem lies with the manner in which the FDDI is configured in conjunction with the Ethernet LAN -- I've been hearing some scare stories about t
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01189.html (11,525 bytes)
- 8. Re: larger ADSM clients (score: 1)
- Author: Charlotte Brooks [mailto:lotti AT US.IBM DOT COM]
- Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:33:43 -0500
- Cindy, I agree with Tab's comments. The first thing to do is determine if it is a general connection problem or a specific ADSM/TSM problem. The quickest way to do this is ftp some large files from y
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01190.html (11,395 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu