Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*hi\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*hi\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. Hi (score: 1): Author: Muhammad Nuzaihan Kamalluddin <zaihan AT unrealasia DOT net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 05:09:14 +0800; This is a test.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-01/msg00010.html (10,052 bytes)
2. hi (score: 1): Author: Shashi Kanbur <shashi AT astro.umass DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:17:02 -0500 (EST); Im using amanda version 2.4.4p1 on a linux amanda server and backing up mainly linux machines but also two irix machines. the disklist entry for these states /scr comp-home-tar and the log file state; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-01/msg00247.html (11,088 bytes)
3. Re: hi (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:51:54 -0500; If you are saying that you now have that tapefile as one piece on the server, presumably extracted from the tape with dd, did you not read the 32k header in front of it? That header contains the exam; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-01/msg00248.html (12,575 bytes)
4. Re: hi (score: 1): Author: Shashi Kanbur <shashi AT astro.umass DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:10:48 -0500 (EST); hi, what i found was that if I extract the tape file onto disk with amrestore /dev/nst0 moa and then dd if=<file> bs=32k skip=1 of=a and then tar xvf a it works. I tried to combine the two commands d; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-01/msg00249.html (13,609 bytes)
5. RE: hi (score: 1): Author: "Glenn E. Sieb" <ges AT lumeta DOT com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:16:40 -0500; Hi Shashi! Try this... dd if=<file> bs=32k skip=1 | tar xvf - Good luck! Glenn -- Glenn E. Sieb System Administrator Lumeta Corporation +1 732 357-3514 (V) +1 732 564-0731 (Fax); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-01/msg00250.html (10,555 bytes)
6. Re: hi (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:30:20 -0500; IIRC, the tar command should have had a - after it. dd if=file bs=32768 skip=1 | tar xzvf - I stuck the z in because your dumptype indicated a compressed file format. Alternatively, if you respositio; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-01/msg00251.html (14,990 bytes)
7. Re: Hi (score: 1): Author: "brussell_36 AT email DOT com" <bbice AT email DOT com>; Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:22:23 +0800; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-10/msg00231.html (10,051 bytes)
8. hi (score: 1): Author: "Serap Çigdemgil" <serap AT hotmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:19:24 +0300; merhabalar bu bir spam degildir 1 kereye mahsus gönderilmistir aradiklariniz için tiklayin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-09/msg00096.html (10,107 bytes)
9. hi (score: 1): Author: "Natalia Elite" <natalia AT superonline DOT com>; Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 18:42:54 +0300; If you are under 21 years of age, or if it is illegal to view adult material in your community, please leave now. Hello! As its title suggests, this site is all about SEX, all kinds of sex. I don't p; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-05/msg00090.html (13,465 bytes)
10. hi (score: 1): Author: "Sarja Horeb" <chann AT hotmail.co DOT il>; Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 22:38:47 +0300; If you are under 21 years of age, or if it is illegal to view adult material in your community, please leave now. We can't be held responsible for your actions. We are not acting in any way to send y; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-05/msg00135.html (11,838 bytes)
11. hi (score: 1): Author: "Isabelle" <isabelle.brua AT hotmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:02:55 +0200; http://www.live.com/isabelle; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2003-01/msg00323.html (10,143 bytes)
12. hi (score: 1): Author: "Angel GrefurT" <lez_jew5 AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 12:59:05 -0700; http://lizaclub.da.ru http://lol.to/bbs.php?bbs=shakira <<< VIP Today Sally. NOT NEED CREDI CARD - PARTY 1. VIDEO 16MB PARTY 2. VIDEO http://pluginaccess.com/?w=preview&type=exe 3MB <<< try now PARTY; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00165.html (11,477 bytes)
13. hi (score: 1): Author: "Angel GrefurT" <lez_jew5 AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 03:56:05 -0700; http://lol.to/bbs.php?bbs=offspring Username: LIZA-ROOM-008 Password: XF459J; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00173.html (11,026 bytes)
14. RE: hi (score: 1): Author: "Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM" <MMARTINEZ AT intranet.reeusda DOT gov>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:44:54 -0400; I really think spam control is necessary here. This mailing list is by far the most spammed list I subscribe to (I subscribe to about twenty lists). I never receive any spam from most of the other li; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00193.html (12,116 bytes)
15. Re: hi (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:16:49 -0400; On Monday 09 September 2002 08:44, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM wrote: Huh? Like most, I use a spam filter with me writing the rules. So, since I pack all that crap up and send it to uce AT ftc DO; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00195.html (13,575 bytes)
16. Re: hi (score: 1): Author: Axel Schaefer <terraerde AT gmx DOT net>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:20:25 +0200; Done. =;-); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00197.html (11,262 bytes)
17. Re: hi (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:46:23 -0400; I have too much time on my hands. The list messages are saved automatically on my system and I just scanned my archive since June 1. Total of 2650+ messages. I found less than twenty I could easily i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00201.html (13,190 bytes)
18. Re: hi (score: 1): Author: Tony Shadwick <tshadwick AT stgroupllc DOT com>; Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 12:22:32 -0500; Honestly, it may seem a bit presumptuous, but most of us are probably on unix mail servers. It also seems obvious that most of us probably use procmail. That being the case, might I suggest using Spa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00203.html (11,941 bytes)
19. RE: hi (score: 1): Author: "Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM" <MMARTINEZ AT intranet.reeusda DOT gov>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:29:09 -0400; i haven't kept statistics, but it seems to me that there's been something like one per day, for the past few weeks. The amount has definitely increased in the past few weeks. prior to that, the amou; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00204.html (13,259 bytes)
20. Re: hi (score: 1): Author: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix AT structbio.vanderbilt DOT edu>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:18:23 -0500; [ Not directed at Jon since he was not the one complaining. ] Our respective tolerance levels are irrelevant to the issue at hand. Spam filtering is the responsibility of the recipient, not an interm; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00205.html (13,328 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]