Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*frame\s+relay\s+nodes\-\-\s+can\s+I\s+avoid\s+another\s+full\s+backup\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. frame relay nodes-- can I avoid another full backup? (score: 1)
Author: Lisa Cabanas <CABANL AT MODOT DOT NET>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:56:17 -0500
Hello again, here's the deal we have approximately 50 frame relay nodes that backup to TSM servers. These NT boxes' drives are almost full (max is 16G on these) and partitions were created to hold da
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-05/msg01302.html (11,572 bytes)

2. Re: frame relay nodes-- can I avoid another full backup? (score: 1)
Author: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 17:13:36 -0400
Haven't looked at 5.1 yet, I know there is a new command something like "move nodedata". However as you are upgrading OS and rearranging disks, I would take your last option - Rename nodes (rename NO
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-05/msg01312.html (13,397 bytes)

3. Re: frame relay nodes-- can I avoid another full backup? (score: 1)
Author: Zlatko Krastev <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:53:16 +0300
Lisa, what about: perform incremental backup from old box generate backupset (devclass file, burn to CDs) transfer the backupset to node restore the data locally from backupset on new box define *sam
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-05/msg01314.html (12,433 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu