Author: "Andrey Shmigelsky" <andrey.offline AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:37:24 +0200
I have configured my tapetype to be DVD size length tapetype DVD_SIZED_DISK define tapetype DVD_SIZED_DISK { comment "DVDsized virtual tape" length 4482 Mbytes filemark 4 KB } And i have enough space
Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:14:09 -0500
On Jan 11, 2008 5:37 AM, Andrey Shmigelsky <andrey.offline AT gmail DOT com> wrote: A few questions: - are you using 'tapetype DVD_SIZED_DISK' in amanda.conf? - how big are your dumps? Dustin -- Stor
Author: "storm66 AT club-internet DOT fr" <storm66 AT club-internet DOT fr>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:31:55 +0100
Hello, One backup partly failed with : FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: k400 /mnt/d_mails lev 1 FAILED [dumps way too big, 1025270 KB, must skip incremental dumps] k400 /home/jpp lev 1 FAILED [dumps
Evidently your tape size is less than the 1.025 GB size of your data, and you have no previous level 0 so Amanda can't generate an incremental. You can either use bigger tapes, enable the tape spanni
Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:13:03 -0400
Your kernel version please? -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) When the speaker
Author: "jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net" <jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:07:45 +0100
Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 20:13 -0400, Gene Heskett a écrit : Kernel 2.6.16 on the "master" machine, 2.6.18 and 2.6.20 on other machines. Frank Smith asks for the size of tape I am using : it is a virt
The physical disk it's on may be big enough , but is the length of your vtapes in your tapetype set to something larger than 1 GB? Frank -- Frank Smith fsmith AT hoovers DOT com Sr. Systems Administr
Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:42:16 -0400
Those are clean from the effect I had in mind, except the 2.6.20.4-r1 recent variation of 2.6.20. Ahh, I see. But what did you specify the size was in your HARD-DISK definition in your amanda.conf? E
Author: "jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net" <jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:03:45 +0200
Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 à 19:26 -0500, Frank Smith a écrit : Hello, I didn't use any tapetype parameter ... I will set one bigger enough and have a try. Regards Storm66
Author: "jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net" <jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:13:10 +0200
Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 à 22:42 -0400, Gene Heskett a écrit : Hello, The Amanda disk space is set to 64 Go, but Frank Smith ask me to look at the tapesize whiwh is not set in my config (virtual tape
Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:12:26 -0400
That's an obvious miss-configuration then. Here is the stanza I use: -- runtapes 1 # number of tapes to be used in a single run of amdump tpchanger "chg-disk" tapedev "file:/amandatapes/Dailys/" chan
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert AT linux-m68k DOT org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:14:12 +0200 (CEST)
You write `partly' failed? Doesn't it just mean that some DLEs were dumped (or estimated to dump) to tape, but Amanda noticed the remaining DLEs couldn't fit anymore? I see it from time to time, too.
Author: "jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net" <jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:03:30 +0200
Le dimanche 25 mars 2007 à 14:12 -0400, Gene Heskett a écrit : Hello, The try was OK, virtual tapes must have a defines size as there is (I think there is) a default size when no tapetype is specifie