Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*amverify\s+fails\s+for\s+large\s+$\?$\s+samba\s+share\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*amverify\s+fails\s+for\s+large\s+$\?$\s+samba\s+share\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. amverify fails for large (?) samba share (score: 1): Author: "Vincent GRENET" <vincent.grenet AT evistel DOT com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:06:15 +0100; Hi. I use amanda to backup a samba share (and other filesystems). I run amverify after each amdump. Everything was ok (for month) until amverify (the backup report was ok) returned: -- amverify daily; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-02/msg00237.html (12,542 bytes)
2. Re: amverify fails for large (?) samba share (score: 1): Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:11:10 +0100; Both verify runs fail reading the same file on the tape: an image of a 1.28 Gb samba share. I checked both tapes by reading the tapes and files header blocks. It does not mean that those files are n; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-02/msg00238.html (12,152 bytes)
3. Re: amverify fails for large (?) samba share (score: 1): Author: Eric Siegerman <erics AT telepres DOT com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:58:27 -0500; Is that gtar old enough to be a problem, or is 1.13.19 known to work? -- It must be said that they would have sounded better if the singer wouldn't throw his fellow band members to the ground and tos; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-02/msg00241.html (11,100 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]