Author: Gavin Henry <ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:15:33 +0000
Again, sorry. I thought it was relevant to both. Yeah, it is hard to follow. - -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1467 624141 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 742001 E ghe
Author: Gavin Henry <ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:14:46 +0000
OK, sorry, sorry. I am bad. Is this because it's not been overwritten before? - -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1467 624141 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 742001 E gh
Author: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <monitor AT oops.co DOT at>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:24:23 +0100
Hi, Jon, on Freitag, 05. November 2004 at 22:09 you wrote to amanda-users: To: users Yes. To: hackers Yes. ;-) I just try to educate my mailer to sort mails that go to a list and also directly to me
And then I go and forget to delete -hackers from the To: list. Dumb Jon, Dumb! -- Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (60
Author: Mitch Collinsworth <mitch AT ccmr.cornell DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:42:22 -0500 (EST)
Would people please stop cross-posting between -users and -hackers. If your message is about using amanda, send it to -users. If it's about the source, send it to -hackers. Don't mean to single out G
It is really best to post to only ONE of the -users or -hackers lists. Decide if it is about the code of amanda, then submit to -hackers. For the overwhelming majority of posts, they concern usage of
Author: Gavin Henry <ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:05:48 +0000
Dear all, After compiling by hand and patching amcheck.c to include our signature, all tests ran fine, backup work to tape etc, but a strange problem with amcheck: <quote> Appserv Tape Server Host Ch
Author: Gavin Henry <ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:59:02 +0000
I agree after re-reading above. It orders the tapes according to what order you put them in the first place, as long as they either match the regex labelstr or are blank. Cheers. - -- Kind Regards, G
Author: Gavin Henry <ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 05:14:57 +0000
Only one backup has been done, but why would amadmin config tape give me the right next tape, but the e-mail/amcheck doesn't? - -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1467 624141
The snarky answer is that they use different logic. Hmm, now the question becomes how and why they use different logic. I do not recall your saying what tape amadmin config says is due. I'm guessing
Author: Gavin Henry <ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:44:39 +0000
OK. Yes, that's right. Agreed. As long as it matches the labelstr. Yes. Yes, OK. Because it matches labelstr, but should they mind? If you number them. But saying that, does the regex require a numbe
I looked over my answer and thought ... should I add that. But you are correct. And I probably should have said "I think it would say a new tape was needed, and that tape2 was ok". But I wasn't certa
Author: Gavin Henry <ghenry AT suretecsystems DOT com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 22:40:51 +0000
Thanks. OK. Ah, date order. Yes, I could even change the regex to anything I want. Fair enough. Well, the server that amcheck reports what tape is next, with a fresh compile, just like the one in que
Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 22:14:36 -0500
Humm, jumping in here, I do believe thats whats happening here when it overruns the available tapesize set in amanda.conf's definition, effectively hitting an EOT. Somehow its skipping the next tape