Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*amanda\-2\.5\.1p3\s+ignores\s+no\-reuse\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*amanda\-2\.5\.1p3\s+ignores\s+no\-reuse\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. amanda-2.5.1p3 ignores no-reuse (score: 1): Author: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:26:57 +0700 (ICT); Hello, I am setting up a new Amanda server. Using virtual tapes on USB disk, it seems to be fast enough (20 to 40 MBps) depending on the hardware, the speed of the holding disks, etc. Faster than the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-08/msg00128.html (11,522 bytes)
2. Re: amanda-2.5.1p3 ignores no-reuse (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:01:30 -0400; I think you've hit an outlying situation. One that is so uncommon that it was not considered during design and coding. Note that nothing that amanda says in the report are inaccurate. It expects 5 ne; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-08/msg00129.html (13,128 bytes)
3. Re: amanda-2.5.1p3 ignores no-reuse (score: 1): Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:00:07 -0400; As Jon said, it's a problem with new tape marked as no-reuse, only the report is bad, amanda will works as expected. The attached patch fix 'amadmin CONF tape' and amreport. I don't know if the patch; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2008-08/msg00145.html (15,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]