Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*a\s+new\s+atl\s+$for\s+xmas\s+\.\.\.$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*a\s+new\s+atl\s+$for\s+xmas\s+\.\.\.$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. a new atl (for xmas ...) (score: 1): Author: Thierry ITTY <thierry.itty AT BESANCON DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:09:25 -0400; Hello all we run tsm since years, currently a 4.2 server on a 2way F50 and 100GB disk pool we have an automated tape library, something custom (a GRAU/ABBA-J with ibm 3590e drives and ca 1000 cartrid; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00637.html (11,541 bytes)
2. Re: a new atl (for xmas ...) (score: 1): Author: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:10:55 -0400; This is one of the best ATLs, most cost effective for sure. The 3590 drive duty cycle is one of the best in the industry. There is no other ATL that supports the 3590 drive except a huge STK silo. A; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00676.html (12,195 bytes)
3. Re: a new atl (for xmas ...) (score: 1): Author: "Emil S. Hansen" <esh AT POP3.BIT DOT DK>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:28:56 +0200; See my reply inline. I backup 200-400 GBs a day to 600 GB diskpool and then onto five 3590 E1A drives in a 3494 with 3 frames (808 cells), and I'm very happy with both the 3590 drives and the 3494 li; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00683.html (11,833 bytes)
4. Re: a new atl (for xmas ...) (score: 1): Author: Daniel Sparrman <daniel.sparrman AT EXIST DOT SE>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:39:55 +0200; Hi What kind of ATL you wish to use, is normally bound to your budget. But if I could rank the tape libraries, I would do it in the following order: 1. StorageTek PowderHorn 9310 with 9840B fibre dri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg00684.html (12,143 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]