Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Z\/OS\s+and\s+TSM\s+\-\s+preferred\s+server\s+level\?\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Z/OS and TSM - preferred server level?? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Kirkman <jmk AT EMAIL.UNC DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:54:36 -0500
We are closing in on bringing up Z/OS 1.4 and with it a new version of TSM server. It looks like 5.1.7 was delivered with our server pac (FMID HDN5510). In a meeting earlier this week a Tivoli rep re
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-11/msg00097.html (11,201 bytes)

2. Re: Z/OS and TSM - preferred server level?? (score: 1)
Author: "Stumpf, Joachim" <joachim.stumpf AT DATEV DOT DE>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:31:21 +0100
Hi, at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1. If you are at 4.x you should have a look at: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PQ80211 We had big problems with the performa
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-11/msg00101.html (11,817 bytes)

3. Re: Z/OS and TSM - preferred server level?? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Kirkman <jmk AT EMAIL.UNC DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:47:04 -0500
Joachim, Thanks, I remember seeing something about this earlier. I wonder if it applies, though, as we are moving from 4.1.x and the problem description specifically references 4.2 and 5.1 -- Jim Kir
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-11/msg00103.html (12,619 bytes)

4. Re: Z/OS and TSM - preferred server level?? (score: 1)
Author: "Stumpf, Joachim" <joachim.stumpf AT DATEV DOT DE>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:19:19 +0100
Jim, I didn't recognize that you are at 4.1. I think theres no problem with the upgrade for you, because the problems we had were with the systemobjects of windows nodes which were included with 4.2.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-11/msg00114.html (13,218 bytes)

5. Re: Z/OS and TSM - preferred server level?? (score: 1)
Author: "Slag, Jerry B." <jslag AT STATE.ND DOT US>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:15:36 -0600
I believe, when IBM was working on the zap, I was told that there was a problem moving from the 4.1 version - something about a legacy member table instead of the backup groups table problem. I'm run
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-11/msg00140.html (13,720 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu