Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wishlist\s+\[was\:\s+Re\:\s+Archives\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wishlist\s+\[was\:\s+Re\:\s+Archives\]\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: Scott McCambly <mccambly AT NETCOM DOT CA>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:06:45 -0500; Hi there, You mentioned "PITDATE" options on the backup sets... Has anyone hear if this is actually being done in the near future? I was shocked to see that point-in-time options were not supported i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01060.html (15,435 bytes)
2. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: "Alan R. White" <arw AT TIPPER.DEMON.CO DOT UK>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:29:05 -0500; Hi, at a presentation given by Ron Riffe at the tail end of last year he thought PIT options were there and I understood from development that it was in the plan. Maybe its a case of it getting throu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01071.html (10,526 bytes)
3. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: Scott McCambly <mccambly AT NETCOM DOT CA>; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:33:43 -0500; you Also be for a or Reclamation the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg01072.html (15,811 bytes)
4. Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: "Alan R. White" <arw AT TIPPER.DEMON.CO DOT UK>; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 17:03:48 -0500; Wouldn't it be cool if the policy copygroups contained additional facilities for specifying that a revision of a file which corresponds to a weekly or monthly 'view' of a filesystem should be retaine; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00538.html (11,098 bytes)
5. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: "Kelly J. Lipp" <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 09:38:18 -0700; I've not been following this thread, but what about Instant Archive instead of actually moving the data again? Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. PO Box 51313 Colorado Springs CO 80919; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00596.html (10,878 bytes)
6. Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:36:16 -0500; Wouldn't it be cool if the policy copygroups contained additional facilities for specifying that a revision of a file which corresponds to a weekly or monthly 'view' of a filesystem should be retaine; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00597.html (10,859 bytes)
7. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: Bill Colwell <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 13:34:06 -0500; Alan, yes it would be cool to have a feature like this. This isn't the first time for it to be discussed on the list or to be submitted to IBM; I submitted it maybe 4 years ago and it was discussed o; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00605.html (20,704 bytes)
8. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: "Alan R. White" <arw AT TIPPER.DEMON.CO DOT UK>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 14:38:13 -0500; Thanks - got to admit it wasn't all original thought anyway - was suggested by one of our guys internally. lets see how it goes. Al; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00607.html (10,697 bytes)
9. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: Bill Colwell <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:36:16 -0500; first submitted it let all - - - workaround larger take for provides with part both reminds anyone, active are (I know I rub follow and expire be look export client, and don't do one preserve and do; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00608.html (21,709 bytes)
10. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: "Alan R. White" <arw AT TIPPER.DEMON.CO DOT UK>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 14:41:42 -0500; Hi Kelly Mmm not possible when you have 400 machines backing up to one ADSM server and they all want a end of month archive. Current implementation of backupsets (aka 'instant archives' - name is awf; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00609.html (11,231 bytes)
11. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: Kelly J. Lipp <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:36:16 -0500; instead facilities length means this franco.martini AT raiffeisen DOT ch; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00610.html (13,309 bytes)
12. Re: Wishlist [was: Re: Archives] (score: 1): Author: Bill Colwell <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:47:08 -0500; Alan, your 'views' proposal would add a lot of utility to backup sets and instant archives. If the views can be generated in a few hours of database updates at the end of the year/quarter/month and i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-12/msg00616.html (16,220 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]