Author: Jeff Connor <connorj AT NIAGARAMOHAWK DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:08:16 -0400
Not sure how much of an issue this will be for some of you but I thought I'd pass along a change we came across in the Windows 4.2.1.0 client. If you are like us, and don't do a great job of excludin
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 08:44:58 -0700
I am almost certain that this change in behavior is not deliberate. The APAR is going to be handled as a code defect, not a doc issue. Skipped files are not cause to fail an incremental backup. Regar
Author: Jeff Connor <connorj AT NIAGARAMOHAWK DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:57:57 -0400
Thanks Andy. Can you find out if this is really a defect or working as designed? The PMR we opened for the problem is 15935,180. Here is an example from our dsmsched.log: Thanks Jeff 10/05/2001 02:07