Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+diskdirs\s+pools\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+diskdirs\s+pools\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Why diskdirs pools (score: 1): Author: Arshad Sheikh <amshaik70 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:01:50 -0500; Forgive my naiveness but why one need to take the backup of dirs on disk pools, I read that it makes restores efficiently, but when you dirs pool is copied to tape to offisite, and then when you try; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00894.html (10,736 bytes)
2. Re: Why diskdirs pools (score: 1): Author: "Vibhute, Bandu" <BVibhute AT BAKING.BESTFOODS DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:53:03 -0400; Salman, It depends on how you implement DISKDIRPOOL. It takes very less space compared to file data. There are various options to keep it in primary pools. You can use cache feature and keep it in di; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00950.html (10,597 bytes)
3. Re: Why diskdirs pools (score: 1): Author: Patrick Boutilier <boutilpj AT STAFF.EDNET.NS DOT CA>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:08:30 -0300; The main benefit that I see is that you can backup more clients simultaneously than you have tape drives in your library. For example, if you want to backup 10 clients at the same time and only have; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00951.html (13,465 bytes)
4. Re: Why diskdirs pools (score: 1): Author: Shekhar Dhotre <shekhar.dhotre.b AT BAYER DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:21:10 -0400; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00953.html (10,259 bytes)
5. Re: Why diskdirs pools (score: 1): Author: Shekhar Dhotre <shekhar.dhotre.b AT BAYER DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:41:09 -0400; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00955.html (10,274 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]