- 1. Whatever happened to ....... (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Lawson <JLAWSON AT ITTHARTFORD DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 22:11:54 +0500
- Perhaps I'm losing my mind (my kids insist I never had one to begin with!). I seem to remember seeing/hearing that all ADSM clients (with the exception of Macintosh) had a command line client. (And o
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1995-11/msg00205.html (10,924 bytes)
- 2. Re: Whatever happened to ....... (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Raibeck <raibeck AT CONNIX DOT COM>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 07:11:16 -0500
- Jerry Lawson asks: Good luck. There is no command line client for Windows 3.1, and I'm not sure we'll ever see one. This is my second biggest requirement for the product: that both types of clients (
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1995-11/msg00206.html (11,693 bytes)
- 3. Re: Whatever happened to ....... (score: 1)
- Author: Helmut Richter <Helmut.Richter AT LRZ-MUENCHEN DOT DE>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 15:03:23 +0100
- Regardless of the product we are talking about (ADSM is here just one of many possible examples), a GUI is *never* sufficient, and a command line interface is *always* needed. I'm not aware of any ex
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1995-11/msg00213.html (11,190 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu