Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Veritas\s+volumes\s+for\s+db\s+storage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Veritas\s+volumes\s+for\s+db\s+storage\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Veritas volumes for db storage (score: 1): Author: "Chetan H. Ravnikar" <Chetan.Ravnikar AT SYNOPSYS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:08:12 -0700; Hi you gurus I am planning to use veritas (0+1) volumes defined into TSM as db volumes, anyone seen any performnace issue here. Platform SUN solaris 2.8 TSM 5.x.x. (not sure yet) Your experience will; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-09/msg01150.html (10,619 bytes)
2. Re: Veritas volumes for db storage (score: 1): Author: Joshua Bassi <jbassi AT IHWY DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:07:21 -0700; There shouldn't be any performance problem with a RAID 10 configuration per say. This version of RAID offers the best level of price performance overall. -- Joshua S. Bassi IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-09/msg01226.html (11,261 bytes)
3. Re: Veritas volumes for db storage (score: 1): Author: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>; Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:24:07 +0300; Veritas raw devices or VxFS filesystems? The latter might be disastrous to your performance. Read the thread "Disk volumes" (started 3 days ago) and especially the post of Scott Walters. Zlatko Krast; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-09/msg01250.html (11,795 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]