Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tivoli\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tivoli\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Tivoli (score: 1): Author: Cindy Bogle <bogle AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 17:33:31 -0700; Saw your posts on Tivoli. The development team (developers, testers, writers, level 2 support, performance engineers, etc.) from SSD will continue to work on ADSM. In fact our team is significantly g; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00238.html (11,007 bytes)
2. Re: Tivoli (score: 1): Author: ALLEN BARTH <abarth AT KEMPER DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 09:50:44 -0600; Yawn..that's nice. Perhaps when the parties are over, you can figure out how to deliver releases of V3 clients that actually do something OTHER than cause new bugs/problems for my users.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00265.html (10,365 bytes)
3. Re: Tivoli (score: 1): Author: "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT NL>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 18:32:45 +0100; IBM-ers on the list! Please ignore these kind of messages and keep up the good work! There will always be people who are very hard to please. Sure, ADSM has some bugs, but is a product which is getti; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00272.html (10,626 bytes)
4. Re: Tivoli (score: 1): Author: ALLEN BARTH [mailto:abarth AT KEMPER DOT COM]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:50:03 -0500; Yawn..that's nice. Perhaps when the parties are over, you can figure out how to deliver releases of V3 clients that actually do something OTHER than cause new bugs/problems for my users.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00273.html (10,408 bytes)
5. Re: Tivoli (score: 1): Author: TJ Saijoen <tsaijoen AT RISCMAN DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 13:30:05 -0500; Eric you are right and I don't think we need to use the listner server to complain about this situation. Regards Tj Riscmanagement IBM-ers on the list! Please ignore these kind of messages and keep u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00286.html (11,806 bytes)
6. Re: Tivoli (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 13:48:40 -0500; Eric - I understand your thoughts on this. But too many customers are frustrated with ADSMv3 quality, and ignoring frustrated customers is the last thing a vendor should do. Appreciate that many ADS; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-12/msg00288.html (12,419 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]