- 1. Time audit library (score: 1)
- Author: brian welsh <brianwelsh3 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 22:09:25 +0200
- Hello, Next weekend there is a teach on our 3494-library. After that we are going do to an audit library. Now I was wondering, based on experience in other sites, how long an audit library took and h
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-04/msg00374.html (10,577 bytes)
- 2. Re: Time audit library (score: 1)
- Author: Gabriel Wiley <wileyg AT US.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:14:10 -0500
- Brain, As long as you use the "checklabel=barcode" you should have it done pretty quick. My largest library is 9 frames(2766 cells) , and it is packed, even if it wasn't - it would still scan the slo
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-04/msg00377.html (11,604 bytes)
- 3. Re: Time audit library (score: 1)
- Author: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>
- Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 18:21:06 -0600
- 10 minutes, SCSI ATL P3000 library, with a capacity of 326 volumes, AIX version of TSM server. That's specifying checklabel=barcode, which might not apply to an IBM library. It's so quick that I've b
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-04/msg00381.html (11,318 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu