Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+\"incremental\s+forever\"\s+paradigm\,\s+Was\:\s+How\s+would\s+you\s+do\s+thi\s+s\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+\"incremental\s+forever\"\s+paradigm\,\s+Was\:\s+How\s+would\s+you\s+do\s+thi\s+s\?\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Was: How would you do thi s? (score: 1): Author: Hilton Tina <HiltonT AT TCE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 12:52:40 -0500; But the backup stgpool to a copypool is incremental in nature. The first time you issue the command, it will copy everything. The next time you issue it, it will only copy the new stuff. It doesn't r; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-03/msg00218.html (14,312 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]