Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tar\s+archive\s+size\s+limitations\s+was\s+Preventing\s+yum\s+or\s+up2date\s+to\s+upd\s+ate\s+gnu\s+tar\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tar\s+archive\s+size\s+limitations\s+was\s+Preventing\s+yum\s+or\s+up2date\s+to\s+upd\s+ate\s+gnu\s+tar\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Tar archive size limitations was Preventing yum or up2date to upd ate gnu tar (score: 1): Author: "Lengyel, Florian" <FLengyel AT gc.cuny DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:18:05 -0400; This business about tar reminds me of a not-terribly well documented problem with tar: under some operatinjg systems, tar has a 2 gigabyte limit on the size of the tar archive! The tar that came with; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-06/msg00071.html (11,572 bytes)
2. Re: Tar archive size limitations was Preventing yum or up2date to upd ate gnu tar (score: 1): Author: Jukka Salmi <j+amanda AT 2005.salmi DOT ch>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:28:20 +0200; Lengyel, Florian --> owner-amanda-users (2005-06-03 11:18:05 -0400): I don't use Linux anymore, but IIRC tar is not to blame here: it's probably a [1]LFS problem. Cheers, Jukka [1] http://www.suse.de; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-06/msg00074.html (11,779 bytes)
3. Re: Tar archive size limitations was Preventing yum or up2date to upd ate gnu tar (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 12:36:14 -0400; I can say that I did a tar -t on a 2.5GB tar file just now, with no errors, so at 1.15 is clean in this regard. Repeating the test using tar-1.13-25 on that same 2.5GB file also worked just fine. --; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2005-06/msg00077.html (12,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]