Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tape\s+Drive\s+Sharing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tape\s+Drive\s+Sharing\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Tape Drive Sharing (score: 1): Author: Rick Marshall <Richard.Marshall AT BMO DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 15:46:27 -0400; Hello Everyone! Do any of you know if ADSM is capable of sharing tape drives with MVS? We have 14 StorageTek silos and a bunch of Timberline 9490 tape drives being used by our OS/390 MVS applications; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00682.html (10,791 bytes)
2. Re: Tape Drive Sharing (score: 1): Author: James SPORER <james.sporer AT CCMAIL.ADP.WISC DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 15:29:31 -0600; ADSM is just like any other MVS application and will compete for drives with the other applications using the drives. The only thing you can do with ADSM is limit the number of drives he will use for; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00689.html (11,511 bytes)
3. Re: Tape Drive Sharing (score: 1): Author: Andreas Buser <andreas.buser AT BASLER DOT CH>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:27:42 +0200; Hi Rick, we have 2 STK-Silos on 2 locations and 1 ADSM Server on OS/390. ADSM has access to all drives. Works fine. You can limit the numbers of dirves ADSM gets in two maners: 1. MOUNTLIMIT in the D; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00709.html (12,015 bytes)
4. Re: Tape Drive Sharing (score: 1): Author: Brian Nick <BRIAN_NICK AT PHL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:01:47 -0400; Rick, You can use any of the drives as OS/390 will handle allocation for you, ADSM just runs as a STC. We do have a seperate set of drives but that is because we are using STK 9840 devices for ADSM.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00718.html (11,452 bytes)
5. Re: Tape Drive Sharing (score: 1): Author: Rick Marshall <Richard.Marshall AT BMO DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:06:44 -0400; Thanks to everyone who responded. I have my answer! Rick Paul J Besz <pbesz AT dsscorp DOT com> on 09/15/99 05:13:42 PM ADSM/MVS acquires it's tape drives via dynamic allocation/deallocation. Paul J; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00776.html (10,766 bytes)
6. Tape Drive Sharing (score: 1): Author: Rick Marshall [SMTP:Richard.Marshall AT BMO DOT COM]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:39:21 -0500; Hello Everyone! Do any of you know if ADSM is capable of sharing tape drives with MVS? We have 14 StorageTek silos and a bunch of Timberline 9490 tape drives being used by our OS/390 MVS applications; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00777.html (10,817 bytes)
7. Tape drive sharing (score: 1): Author: Trevor Foley <Trevor.Foley AT BANKERSTRUST.COM DOT AU>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 09:48:11 +1100; Hi, We have a requirement to share our 3590 drives within a 3494 tape library between multiple ADSM servers. I am trying to work out whether or not the new mount limit management functions of ADSM V3; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-02/msg01095.html (11,293 bytes)
8. Re: Tape drive sharing (score: 1): Author: Matthias Feyerabend <matthias AT CLRI6A.GSI DOT DE>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 11:06:57 +0100; Hello, no problems sharing 3590 tapes in a 3494 tape robot between ADSM servers on the same node with ADSM Version 2 server. ADSM servers on different nodes should not have access to the same tape dr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-02/msg01111.html (10,389 bytes)
9. Re: Tape drive sharing (score: 1): Author: John Groves <jmg AT OPENMIC DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 14:10:47 -0600; Open Microsystems' Enterprise DistribuTAPE software supports sharing of both tape drives and libraries in StorageTek libraries. EDT works with ADSM V3 and V4, and can share tape drives either over th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-02/msg01136.html (10,629 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]