Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\s+server\s+\-\s+NT\s+vs\.\s+Solaris\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\s+server\s+\-\s+NT\s+vs\.\s+Solaris\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. TSM server - NT vs. Solaris (score: 1): Author: Viliam Varga <Varga AT LOGIN DOT SK>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:36:48 +0200; Hi, I need to compare TSM server on Windows NT and TSM server on Sun Solaris. What are main differences? I know, that TSM is faster and more stable on Solaris, but I have not experience in real envir; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01085.html (10,753 bytes)
2. Re: TSM server - NT vs. Solaris (score: 1): Author: Shekhar Dhotre <Shekhar.Dhotre.B AT BAYER DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:16:19 -0400; TSM on AIX is really fast, reliable , and easy to restore from mksysb. integration of TSM and AIX is good since both are IBM products. shekhar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01092.html (10,634 bytes)
3. Re: TSM server - NT vs. Solaris (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:34:29 -0400; The long-suffering MVS/OS390 customers must be having a good laugh at that! Richard Sims, BU; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01095.html (10,643 bytes)
4. Re: TSM server - NT vs. Solaris (score: 1): Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:40:53 -0500; I have to agree here. I try to make it a habbit to focus on good and not dwell on bad... with that said, let me say I really like all my experiences with ADSM/TSM on RS/6000's running AIX with 3494's; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01098.html (11,526 bytes)
5. Re: TSM server - NT vs. Solaris (score: 1): Author: Shekhar Dhotre <Shekhar.Dhotre.B AT BAYER DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:50:36 -0400; I am talking Strictly about AIX -AIX-AIX and TSM .; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01099.html (10,533 bytes)
6. Re: TSM server - NT vs. Solaris (score: 1): Author: Joe Gross <jgross AT STIMPY DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:47:25 -0700; I run TSM 3.7 on solaris 7-64 bit with a pretty large installation and have been particularly unimpressed with the stability of the server code. I've run though 3.7.1 to 3.7.3.7 last night when I had; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-07/msg01107.html (11,416 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]