Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\s+migration\s+from\s+5\.1\s+to\s+5\.2\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. TSM migration from 5.1 to 5.2 (score: 1)
Author: Lawrence Clark <Larry_Clark AT THRUWAY.STATE.NY DOT US>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:09:51 -0400
Hi: We are getting set for the migration from TSM 5.1 to 5.2. For people who have already done this, did you precede the install of the 5.2 software with an 'audit db fix=yes'?
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-08/msg00689.html (10,872 bytes)

2. Re: TSM migration from 5.1 to 5.2 (score: 1)
Author: Henrik Wahlstedt <shwl AT STATOIL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:34:03 +0200
No! I would not do an audit db if I dont have been told to do one by IBM support, or if I have strong evidence that I need to do an audit. The upgrade itself does not require an audit db! //Henrik <L
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-08/msg00692.html (12,845 bytes)

3. Re: TSM migration from 5.1 to 5.2 (score: 1)
Author: "Park, Rod" <rod.park AT TYSON DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:41:08 -0500
Just curious.... Why would you not do an audit DB and what all does an audit DB do? No! I would not do an audit db if I dont have been told to do one by IBM support, or if I have strong evidence that
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-08/msg00693.html (13,572 bytes)

4. Re: TSM migration from 5.1 to 5.2 (score: 1)
Author: Lawrence Clark <Larry_Clark AT THRUWAY.STATE.NY DOT US>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:08:37 -0400
Checks the internal consistency of the data and fixes/ resolves inconsistencies. I recall this was recommended when we upgraded from ADSM 3.0 to TSM 4.0. At the time we were told that if the upgrade
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-08/msg00698.html (14,220 bytes)

5. Re: TSM migration from 5.1 to 5.2 (score: 1)
Author: Lawrence Clark <Larry_Clark AT THRUWAY.STATE.NY DOT US>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:09:30 -0400
Oh, you would NOT do an auditdb because it runs a very long time................ Just curious.... Why would you not do an audit DB and what all does an audit DB do? No! I would not do an audit db if
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-08/msg00699.html (13,750 bytes)

6. Re: TSM migration from 5.1 to 5.2 (score: 1)
Author: Lloyd Dieter <dieter AT SNRGY DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:02:19 -0400
Mostly because it typically takes a *very* long time to run (meaning many hours or even days) on a database of any size, and isn't usually necessary, unless something is badly broken. -Lloyd On Thu,
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-08/msg00706.html (15,283 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu