Author: Lawrence Clark <Larry_Clark AT THRUWAY.STATE.NY DOT US>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:09:51 -0400
Hi: We are getting set for the migration from TSM 5.1 to 5.2. For people who have already done this, did you precede the install of the 5.2 software with an 'audit db fix=yes'?
Author: Henrik Wahlstedt <shwl AT STATOIL DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:34:03 +0200
No! I would not do an audit db if I dont have been told to do one by IBM support, or if I have strong evidence that I need to do an audit. The upgrade itself does not require an audit db! //Henrik <L
Just curious.... Why would you not do an audit DB and what all does an audit DB do? No! I would not do an audit db if I dont have been told to do one by IBM support, or if I have strong evidence that
Author: Lawrence Clark <Larry_Clark AT THRUWAY.STATE.NY DOT US>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:08:37 -0400
Checks the internal consistency of the data and fixes/ resolves inconsistencies. I recall this was recommended when we upgraded from ADSM 3.0 to TSM 4.0. At the time we were told that if the upgrade
Author: Lawrence Clark <Larry_Clark AT THRUWAY.STATE.NY DOT US>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:09:30 -0400
Oh, you would NOT do an auditdb because it runs a very long time................ Just curious.... Why would you not do an audit DB and what all does an audit DB do? No! I would not do an audit db if
Mostly because it typically takes a *very* long time to run (meaning many hours or even days) on a database of any size, and isn't usually necessary, unless something is badly broken. -Lloyd On Thu,