Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\s+fault\s+tolerance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\s+fault\s+tolerance\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TSM fault tolerance (score: 1): Author: bizzorg <bizzorg AT COMCAST DOT NET>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 00:13:35 -0400; Is there anyone(else) out there relying only on RAID for TSM fault tolerance? I just attended the Advanced TSM class and learned that RAID is not sufficient. Database and log mirror copy volumes are; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-07/msg00186.html (12,186 bytes)
2. Re: TSM fault tolerance (score: 1): Author: Jin Bae Chi <Jbaechi AT CSCC DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:41:46 -0400; Have you considered RAID 0+1 or 10? It give you mirror copies and stripping. It may depend whether your RAID controller supports it or not. thanks. Is there anyone(else) out there relying only on RAI; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-07/msg00197.html (12,078 bytes)
3. Re: TSM fault tolerance (score: 1): Author: "Coats, Jack" <Jack.Coats AT BANKSTERLING DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:32:44 -0500; yes, we rely on raid for TSM faut tollerance. This is not the best, but we don't have enough space, and the TSM design that was done before I got here already had it implemented. We do have enough di; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-07/msg00215.html (12,627 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]