- 1. TSM Upgrade frequency (score: 1)
- Author: Todd Lundstedt <Todd_Lundstedt AT VIA-CHRISTI DOT ORG>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:47:06 -0600
- For you folks that patch your TSM server frequently (like the individual from Oxford University who upgraded from some version to 5.1.6.0 on Feb3, then to 5.1.6.1 on Feb7, and now planning to upgrade
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-02/msg00715.html (11,804 bytes)
- 2. Re: TSM Upgrade frequency (score: 1)
- Author: Eliza Lau <lau AT VTCAT.CC.VT DOT EDU>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:50:55 -0500
- Todd, have to match between the server and the storage agent. If all your storage agents are at 4.2.1.7, upgrading the server to 4.2.1.9 should be ok. Eliza Lau Virginia Tech Computing Center
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-02/msg00767.html (12,321 bytes)
- 3. Re: TSM Upgrade frequency (score: 1)
- Author: Alex Paschal <AlexPaschal AT FREIGHTLINER DOT COM>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:05:26 -0800
- Hmm. That's interesting, because I've seen several of the TSM server patch readme's specifically stating that the storage agent must be the same patch level. For example, the AIX 5.1.5.1 and 5.1.5.2
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-02/msg00803.html (13,151 bytes)
- 4. Re: TSM Upgrade frequency (score: 1)
- Author: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:06:29 +0200
- Todd, For the original question: up to now majority of our customers have Storage Agent nodes and we have no problems with upgrades. Mostly these are AIX servers (Windows ones are smaller and go over
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-02/msg01017.html (14,327 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu