Author: Robin Sharpe <Robin_Sharpe AT BERLEX DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:19:07 -0500
Orville, Thanks for your thoughts. We do use Control-M for all of our scheduling in the Unix environment, and are moving towards Windows deployment too. I am surprised, though, about your comment on
Author: Orville Lantto <orville.lantto AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:26:22 -0500
TSM licenses (and pricing) has been based on the environment for some years. Check with your IBM Business Partner to get the details. Orville L. Lantto Glasshouse Technologies, Inc. Cell: 952-738-193
yes, you do need to buy tsm licenses for each server, they are the same as any other server(-type client) cpu in your environment. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdien
wow... you do know that 560 GB is the limit (iirc?). these could be accomplished by running multiple instances on one dedicated server as well. The latter also saves the cost of upgrading several tsm
Hmmm. I'm facing a similar issue, even though my database is "only" 210 GB. But mine churns a LOT. Finding time for expiration is driving me nuts. I've been designing an approach that will let me eit