Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\s+AND\s+ACCESS\s+DATABASE\s+ISSUES\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TSM\s+AND\s+ACCESS\s+DATABASE\s+ISSUES\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TSM AND ACCESS DATABASE ISSUES (score: 1): Author: Laura Booth <lbooth AT CARILION DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:01:57 -0400; Server: Windows 2000 SP3 TSM Version: 5.1.9 OFM: Version 8.0 I have a Windows 2000 SP4 box that is running an Access database. This box has Open File Manger configured and running. Each night when TS; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00499.html (10,627 bytes)
2. Re: TSM AND ACCESS DATABASE ISSUES (score: 1): Author: Zlatko Krastev <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 22:03:23 +0300; Whener any method to take backups while the data is changing is used, you risk to have those backups inconsistent. Will the method be St. Bernard OFM, TSM v5.2 OFM or SERialization=DYnamic, does not; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00578.html (11,528 bytes)
3. Re: TSM AND ACCESS DATABASE ISSUES (score: 1): Author: Bill Boyer <bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:32:33 -0400; There is even a Microsoft document saying to not even copy an open Access database, much less take a backup and expect it to be good. I can't find the document right now, my C-drive is even more clut; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-09/msg00579.html (12,158 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]