Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TDP\s+for\s+SAP\s+R\/3\s+versus\s+BMC\s+SQL\s+Backtrack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TDP\s+for\s+SAP\s+R\/3\s+versus\s+BMC\s+SQL\s+Backtrack\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TDP for SAP R/3 versus BMC SQL Backtrack (score: 1): Author: Rolf Meyer <rolf.meyer AT SUBNET DOT DE>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:02:44 +0200; Hello, on our site SQL Backtrack is in production for nearly two years. Now I have to compare both solutions. We are running 50+ SAP systems on HP and SUN Solaris systems with Oracle 64bit databases.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg01264.html (10,688 bytes)
2. Re: TDP for SAP R/3 versus BMC SQL Backtrack (score: 1): Author: "Davidson, Becky" <Becky.Davidson AT SLBG DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:06:43 -0500; We used to run SQL Backtrack and we now run TDP for SAP R/3. In my opinion here are the differences SQL Backtrack Benefits - great compression ratio - seems to handle well large databases Disadvantag; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-10/msg01268.html (11,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]