Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TCPwindow\s+size\s+on\s+Solaris\s+5\.8\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TCPwindow\s+size\s+on\s+Solaris\s+5\.8\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. TCPwindow size on Solaris 5.8 (score: 1): Author: "Wholey, Joseph (IDS DM&DS)" <JWholey AT EXCHANGE.ML DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:44:46 -0400; Why is it I can only set the TCPWindow to 64 on Solaris client. I have a GIGE card on this server and believe that the 64K TCPWindow is "killing" my thruput. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Re; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-04/msg00659.html (11,085 bytes)
2. Re: TCPwindow size on Solaris 5.8 (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary D." <GLEE AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:00:14 -0500; What kind of throughput are you getting? I have a gig card, and get around 10,000k bytes network data transfer rate. I have the following settings: tcpw 64 tcpb 256 txnb 25600; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-04/msg00661.html (10,956 bytes)
3. Re: TCPwindow size on Solaris 5.8 (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:37:42 -0400; In postings like this we would like to see what independent measurements, outside of the suspect product, that were made on the questioned ethernet. If you refer to the archives you will see numerou; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-04/msg00668.html (11,670 bytes)
4. Re: TCPwindow size on Solaris 5.8 (score: 1): Author: Paul Ripke <stixpjr AT BIGPOND.NET DOT AU>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:33:27 +1000; Why is it I can only set the TCPWindow to 64 on Solaris client. I have a GIGE card on this server and believe that the 64K TCPWindow is "killing" my thruput. Any help would be greatly appreciated. R; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-04/msg00671.html (11,824 bytes)
5. Re: TCPwindow size on Solaris 5.8 (score: 1): Author: "Wholey, Joseph (IDS DM&DS)" <JWholey AT EXCHANGE.ML DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:30:56 -0400; Gary, On some servers I get as much as 64MB/sec (which is great) and on others, I'm getting as little as 4MB-9MB/sec. From what I'm told, these clients with GIGE cards are on a GIG network (which you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-04/msg00701.html (11,824 bytes)
6. Re: TCPwindow size on Solaris 5.8 (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary D." <GLEE AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:54:56 -0500; changed them both to 512. We'll see what we get tonight. Going to make a really big file hundreds of mb to test. Let you know how it goes.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-04/msg00702.html (10,993 bytes)
7. Re: TCPwindow size on Solaris 5.8 (score: 1): Author: "Wholey, Joseph (IDS DM&DS)" <JWholey AT EXCHANGE.ML DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:54:36 -0400; Great doc... thanks Richard. In postings like this we would like to see what independent measurements, outside of the suspect product, that were made on the questioned ethernet. If you refer to the a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2003-04/msg00739.html (12,061 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]