Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Systems\s+Monitor\s+Question\s+\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Systems\s+Monitor\s+Question\s+\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Systems Monitor Question .... (score: 1): Author: Richard Voninski <voninski AT PSWTECH DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 15:28:52 -0600; Sorry. I ran into this one earlier this year and SYSMON is not y2k compliant. Rich Voninski; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1998-11/msg00000.html (10,477 bytes)
2. Re: Systems Monitor Question .... (score: 1): Author: "Youngmann, Patricia L." <YoungPL1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 17:09:22 -0500; As far I as know, Systems Monitor is strictly an IBM product that does not integrate with Tivoli's NetView 5.x. IBM is not going to develop SM any further and so it will NOT be Y2K compliant. In fact; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1998-11/msg00042.html (11,812 bytes)
3. Re: Systems Monitor Question .... (score: 1): Author: Jane Curry <jane.curry AT SKILLS-1ST.CO DOT UK>; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 08:07:39 +0000; As Pat says, the Systems Information Agent (SIA) of the original sysmon is no longer supported and is not Y2K compliant - that's the bit that provided somewhat similar functionality to the Tivoli Dis; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1998-11/msg00046.html (11,268 bytes)
4. Re: Systems Monitor Question .... (score: 1): Author: James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 09:53:10 -0500; The current MLM is Y2K compliant James Shanks Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support Jane Curry <jane.curry AT SKILLS-1ST.CO DOT UK> on 11/04/98 03:07:39 AM Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1998-11/msg00055.html (11,654 bytes)
5. Systems Monitor Question .... (score: 1): Author: Sean Goldsworthy <seang AT CA.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:50:37 -0500; Hello All. Does anyone know if Systems Monitor is Y2K Compliant? We are implementing Netview 5.1 and are concerned about the SM agents and their Y2K compliance. Any info appreciated. Sincerely, Sean; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1998-10/msg00549.html (10,188 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]