Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 13:57:22 -0500
As you've no doubt discovered, this means that the REQ packet was too large to fit into a single UDP datagram. I know that we've added some additional information to the packets in recent versions, b
I don't know if 2.5.1 is old enough to qualify for this issue, but it used to be the case that the entire set of disklists for a client had to fit in a single packet. What that meant is that if you h
Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:46:52 -0500
The solution is to upgrade, but a workaround is to create a second IP address and DNS name on the same physical client, and move some of the disklist entries to the latter. Or change to the 'bsdtcp'
Author: Leon Meßner <l.messner AT physik.tu-berlin DOT de>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:22:08 +0100
Hi, On this backupset i have 28 dle's. I'm running the latest Amanda from the Ports. Perhaps i should ask the maintainer about updating to 2.6.x. I don't know why the port uses this old version. The
Leon Me=DFner wrote at 12:22 +0100 on Nov 6, 2008: it used = fit in = dozen = into = IP = the = s I've been applying the following patch to bump up the max datagram size since amanda 2.4.1 (minor dif
Author: Leon Meßner <l.messner AT physik.tu-berlin DOT de>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:01:17 +0100
Hi, i get the following message with Amanda-2.5.1p3 on FreeBSD7.0: FAILED [hmm, disk was stranded on waitq] planner: ERROR Request to myhostandserver failed: error sending REQ: send REQ to myhostands