Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Status\s+of\s+\"\-\-with\-portrange\"\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Status\s+of\s+\"\-\-with\-portrange\"\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Status of "--with-portrange"? (score: 1): Author: KEVIN ZEMBOWER <KZEMBOWE AT jhuccp DOT org>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:53:59 -0400; I'm getting ready to write up my notes on what I learned on amanda's use of ports in firewalls, and have one further question. Someplace, I thought I read that the configuration option '--with-portra; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-09/msg00151.html (10,852 bytes)
2. Re: Status of "--with-portrange"? (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:20:49 -0400; --with-portrange == --with-tcpportrange --with-portrange != --with-udpportrange Too many people thought --with-portrange affected both tcp and udp ports. Now the recommendation is to use the explicit; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2004-09/msg00152.html (11,184 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]