Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solaris\s+10\s+support\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solaris\s+10\s+support\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Steve Roder <spr AT REXX.ACSU.BUFFALO DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:01:53 -0400; Hi All, Has anyone heard when TSM will support Solaris 10? Thanks, Steve Roder University at Buffalo (spr AT buffalo DOT edu | (716)645-3564); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-06/msg00133.html (11,596 bytes)
2. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:34:50 -0600; For SPARC, we are currently targetting end of 2Q05 or beginning of 3Q05. Note that this is not a formal announcement or commitment, and is subject to change at the discretion of IBM. If you need a mo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-06/msg00139.html (12,481 bytes)
3. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Steve Roder <spr AT REXX.ACSU.BUFFALO DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:53:04 -0400; Thanks very much Andy for the prompt reply! Steve Roder University at Buffalo (spr AT buffalo DOT edu | (716)645-3564); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-06/msg00141.html (12,967 bytes)
4. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Justin Case <justin.case AT DUKE DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:45:45 -0400; FYI We have the latest TSM client backup/archive code running on Solaris 10 test machine now so it is running but not yet supported. We also have the latest TDPO code installed for Oracle and is runn; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-06/msg00143.html (13,584 bytes)
5. Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Siegle <jsiegle AT PSU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:01:08 -0400; Looks like the latest patch set that came out this morning mentions Solaris 10 support.. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com:/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v5r3/Solaris/v530/TSM530C_FIX12_S; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-06/msg00694.html (10,528 bytes)
6. Solaris 10 Support (score: 1): Author: Donnie Cranford <mozilla AT IMPERIALNETWORK DOT ORG>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:17:48 -0600; I just tried to install 5.2.4 onto my Solaris 10 GA install, and it failed, apparently TSM 5.2 does not support Solaris 10, does anyone know if 5.2 will support Solaris 10, or if 5.3 will support Sol; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-02/msg00039.html (10,964 bytes)
7. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Lance Nakata <LNakata AT SLAC.STANFORD DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:40:20 -0800; I asked about Solaris x86 TSM client support in November 2004. On 11/20/2004, Andy Raibeck in Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development said "There are no plans to release an x86 TSM client for Solar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-02/msg00138.html (11,779 bytes)
8. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:49:42 -0700; While I have indicated that Intel support is not in plan, the ADSM-L forum is really not the proper place to address TSM product requirements. If you have a need for this support (or for any product; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-02/msg00139.html (13,094 bytes)
9. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Donnie Cranford <mozilla AT IMPERIALNETWORK DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:55:47 -0600; I suppose I must not have clarified what "I" was looking for... I am wondering when TSM is going to be support the SPARC version of Solaris 10, as I want to move my current 5.2 server running on Sola; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-02/msg00140.html (15,160 bytes)
10. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:45:11 -0700; SPARC support for Solaris 10 is not being ignored. While the OS code itself may be available, it is not quite as simple as that; we have to work it into our own plans along with other work we are pla; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-02/msg00141.html (15,883 bytes)
11. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Bob Booth - CITES <booth AT UIUC DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:14:08 -0600; We have been running the 5.3 client on SPARC Solaris 10 for some time now. As far as we can tell, after many tests, it runs just fine. We have run it on Beta and GA. I don't think it is officially su; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-02/msg00142.html (11,935 bytes)
12. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Carl Makin <carl AT XENA.IPAUSTRALIA.GOV DOT AU>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:45:26 +1100; While I have indicated that Intel support is not in plan, the ADSM-L forum is really not the proper place to address TSM product requirements. If you have a need for this support (or for any product; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-02/msg00192.html (11,523 bytes)
13. Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Tim Hollingshead <tim AT DATAEDGE DOT NET>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:40:25 -0600; Can anyone provide information on BA client support for Solaris 10? Time frames? Thanks, Tim Hollingshead Dataedge Solutions; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00746.html (10,252 bytes)
14. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Len Boyle <SNOLEN AT VM.SAS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:58:54 EST; And will it include the support of the x86 Solaris 10 both 32 and 64bit. Thanks len; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00778.html (10,580 bytes)
15. Re: Solaris 10 support (score: 1): Author: Tim Hollingshead <tim AT DATAEDGE DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:48:11 -0600; Let me ask this question a slightly different way... One of my clients who is a Sun Administrator asked me about Solaris 10 support because he has heard rumors that Tivoli/IBM have decided not to sup; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00794.html (11,229 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]