Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solaris\s+\/\s+Adaptec\s+compatibility\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Solaris\s+\/\s+Adaptec\s+compatibility\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Solaris / Adaptec compatibility (score: 1): Author: "Richmond, Jeff" <richmond AT SHARPLABS DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:41:53 -0700; All, I have an IBM 3575 library running the latest Solaris ADSM server code. I am running the server on an Ultra-1, because at the time of purchase (Dec. of last year), IBM did not support PCI-based; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00537.html (11,169 bytes)
2. Re: Solaris / Adaptec compatibility (score: 1): Author: "Viswanathan, Ramesh (CNA)" <ramesh AT SCR.SIEMENS DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:02:24 -0400; I have been running ADSM on a Sun E250 with two SUN PCI differential SCSI cards connected to a ATL 2640. I am sorry, I don't know if Adaptec Cards will work, but I think the Sun Cards are worth purch; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00541.html (10,485 bytes)
3. Re: Solaris / Adaptec compatibility (score: 1): Author: Fredrik Lundholm <exce7 AT CE.CHALMERS DOT SE>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:56:31 +0200; Hello, Hmm so how will ADSM sense the difference between sbus/pci? The programming interface should remain the same between different busses, that's what you have solaris for. Adaptec has abandoned s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-09/msg00713.html (11,027 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]