Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Slow\s+restore\s+for\s+large\s+NT\s+client\s+outcome\.\.\s+appeal\s+to\s+Tivoli\s+Development\/Support\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Slow\s+restore\s+for\s+large\s+NT\s+client\s+outcome\.\.\s+appeal\s+to\s+Tivoli\s+Development\/Support\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Slow restore for large NT client outcome.. appeal to Tivoli Development/Support (score: 1): Author: Jeff Connor <connorj AT NIAGARAMOHAWK DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:21:43 -0400; I posted the memo below to this listserv last week when we were having trouble with the performance restoring a large NT drive. This memo is for the people who wanted to know how we made out in the e; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-09/msg00772.html (19,243 bytes)
2. Re: Slow restore for large NT client outcome.. appeal to Tivoli Development/Support (score: 1): Author: Nicholas Cassimatis/Raleigh/IBM <nickpc AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:52:55 -0400; Jeff, One thing to show your NT Admins is just how much overhead NTFS has. The way I've done this before is to copy a drive, either locally or over the network. If you take one of the drives with a l; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-09/msg00779.html (12,593 bytes)
3. Re: Slow restore for large NT client outcome.. appeal to Tivoli Development/Support (score: 1): Author: "Greazel, Alex" <Greazel.Alex AT PRINCIPAL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:44:00 -0500; Can TSM do an image backup on NT? (If it can)That will dramatically decrease the amount of time it takes to do backups/restores for file systems that have tons of small files.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-09/msg00781.html (11,718 bytes)
4. Re: Slow restore for large NT client outcome.. appeal to Tivoli Development/Support (score: 1): Author: "Kelly J. Lipp" <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:29:46 -0600; Would other backup tools suffer the same problem then? If this is a filesystem problem I would expect so. To the original poster: how long does it take Barfserve to restore a 60 GB filesystem with 10; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-09/msg00796.html (12,041 bytes)
5. Re: Slow restore for large NT client outcome.. appeal to Tivoli Development/Support (score: 1): Author: George Yang <george_yang AT VENCOR DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:00:45 -0400; We have same problems. It took 6 hrs to restore 220MB with 300,000 small files without DIRMC, with disk DIRMC it reduce to 3 hrs. However it is still too slow. I did test for multi-session--multi dri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-09/msg00800.html (12,236 bytes)
6. Re: Slow restore for large NT client outcome.. appeal to Tivoli Development/Support (score: 1): Author: George Yang <george_yang AT VENCOR DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:01:44 -0400; How so?? George; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-09/msg00801.html (11,520 bytes)
7. Re: Slow restore for large NT client outcome.. appeal to Tivoli Development/Support (score: 1): Author: "Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT GLORYWORKS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:55:36 -0700; Not today. But I have heard it is coming. Also MS is adding a native NTFS image backup to NT 6.0 (aka Whistler). That will definitely be nice... -- Joshua S. Bassi Joshua S. Bassi Senior Technical Co; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-09/msg00822.html (11,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]