Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Should\s+LOADDB\s+take\s+this\s+long\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Should\s+LOADDB\s+take\s+this\s+long\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Should LOADDB take this long? (score: 1): Author: William Boyer <wboyer AT PTD DOT NET>; Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:50:18 -0400; TSM 3.7.3.0 running on OS/390 2.9 Last night our automated processes to shut the system down didn't take into account that TSM would take a few extra minutes to halt due to reclamation running. The a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00571.html (12,013 bytes)
2. Re: Should LOADDB take this long? (score: 1): Author: Adolph Kahan <akahan AT ICA DOT NET>; Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 18:17:10 -0400; I assume you mean 78 million entries for a total of 6.9GB. Then yes it does take that long to do a LOADDB. I've heard of slightly larger databases taking over 48 hours to reload.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00572.html (10,631 bytes)
3. Re: Should LOADDB take this long? (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:50:15 -0400; There was a bug that caused TSM to hang coming up at "Recovery log mount in progress". And it just never comes up. I know it hit the NT server and AIX server at 3.7.2, and was fixed in 3.7.4. Not sur; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00599.html (10,870 bytes)
4. Re: Should LOADDB take this long? (score: 1): Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:16:40 -0400; Quoting William Boyer <wboyer AT PTD DOT NET>: [Material deleted] We have a TSM server, and used to have exactly the combinatation of release levels mentioned above. One day we did a system IPL and w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2001-04/msg00600.html (12,165 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]