Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Server\s+partitioning\s+using\s+TSM\s+library\s+sharing\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Server partitioning using TSM library sharing (score: 1)
Author: Scott McCambly <mccambly AT ATTCANADA DOT CA>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 16:26:42 -0400
Hello fellow TSMers, We have a fairly large TSM server that we are planning to partition into 2 servers. In other words, add a second server and split the client nodes across the two. The hardware en
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00735.html (12,399 bytes)

2. Re: Server partitioning using TSM library sharing (score: 1)
Author: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:51:25 +0300
Scott, you hit the bullseye - the main problem would be volumes. But not only ones used by single (deleted) node. The ones used by two nodes might be bigger problem. Let say volume CBA321 hold the da
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00760.html (14,016 bytes)

3. Re: Server partitioning using TSM library sharing (score: 1)
Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <DWIGHT.E.COOK AT SAIC DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:14:18 -0700
Whew, being mighty bold but you ~might~ be able to get it to work... I'd do everything with the library NOT available to the system, this MIGHT allow you to clean out references to volumes not used o
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00763.html (12,731 bytes)

4. Re: Server partitioning using TSM library sharing (score: 1)
Author: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:39:36 -0400
If you are using 2 different NICs on the same physical server or two physically different servers you can define your machine to the 3494 twice. In this way, I would think the owner thing would be no
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00806.html (12,168 bytes)

5. Re: Server partitioning using TSM library sharing (score: 1)
Author: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 01:05:58 -0500
Oooh! This gives me the heebie-jeebies! I think you really need to sit down and think about whether you want to pursue this strategy at all. It just sounds very dangerous, with a downside risk that y
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00811.html (16,777 bytes)

6. Re: Server partitioning using TSM library sharing (score: 1)
Author: "William F. Colwell" <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:09:44 -0400
Scott, I haven't done this but I have thought about it before. I suggest some additional steps for safety. 1. empty out the diskpool and delete the volumes. Make sure the copypool is a complete image
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00831.html (14,043 bytes)

7. Re: Server partitioning using TSM library sharing (score: 1)
Author: Zlatko Krastev <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:29:27 +0300
Roger, if we have to talk about the safest way it has to be export/import node. With full backup you ensure only the latest copies of the files are on the server. And what can we do if after node's d
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-07/msg00917.html (17,703 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu