Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Router\s+down\s+\-\s+stopping\s+multiple\s+node\s+downs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Router\s+down\s+\-\s+stopping\s+multiple\s+node\s+downs\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Router down - stopping multiple node downs (score: 1): Author: Leonard Bocock <leonard.bocock AT NZ.UNISYS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:17:58 +1200; NetViewers... Does anyone know of, or have, smarts to prevent multiple node downs if a router is down? I had heard the NetView Integration Pack for TEC would do it in TEC rules, but it appears not to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00448.html (11,391 bytes)
2. Re: Router down - stopping multiple node downs (score: 1): Author: Peter Hadamovsky <Peter.Hadamovsky AT DEBIS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:06:27 +0100; Hi Leonard, Do you use NetView only - or do you forward the events to a TEC? The following Ruleset works fine on the NetView machine (if you run the nvevent and select the apropriate rule) - and the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00449.html (14,099 bytes)
3. Re: Router down - stopping multiple node downs (score: 1): Author: "Prokott, Joe" <Joe.Prokott AT WESTGROUP DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 13:02:31 -0600; Peter, This is a fine rule, but it doesn't address a few issues: (1) The "interface down/up" part of the rule does not consider which interface the "Reset on Match" is looking at - it only looks at t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00473.html (14,250 bytes)
4. Re: Router down - stopping multiple node downs (score: 1): Author: Leonard Bocock <leonard.bocock AT NZ.UNISYS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 08:45:59 +1200; Peter Yes we do use TEC integration so i'll give it a go and see the results Thanks very much! Leonard Peter Hadamovsky <Peter.Hadamovsky AT DEBIS DOT COM> on 24/02/99 19:06:27 Please respond to Disc; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00475.html (14,563 bytes)
5. Re: Router down - stopping multiple node downs (score: 1): Author: Eric Miner <Eric.Miner AT TRAVELERS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 09:07:53 -0500; Joe, My understanding of TFNC is that it will NOT apply status info to NetView's maps. However, I believe that SMARTS' "SMART Pinger" add-on used in conjunction with their IPFM (and maybe with TFNC s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00490.html (13,055 bytes)
6. Re: Router down - stopping multiple node downs (score: 1): Author: "Prokott, Joe" <Joe.Prokott AT WESTGROUP DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 08:19:20 -0600; So, how much is that product? Joe Joe, My understanding of TFNC is that it will NOT apply status info to NetView's maps. However, I believe that SMARTS' "SMART Pinger" add-on used in conjunction with; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00491.html (13,335 bytes)
7. Re: Router down - stopping multiple node downs (score: 1): Author: Eric Miner <Eric.Miner AT TRAVELERS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 14:42:02 -0500; I believe it originally listed for around $15,000. But prices change from time to time, I'm sure, so you're best to contact SMARTS about current pricing. -- So, how much is that product? Joe Joe, My; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/1999-02/msg00520.html (13,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]