- 1. Re: Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Stapleton <stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM>
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:54:41 -0500
- Yes. Read the 5.1 Administrator's Guide. It is available on the 'Net. (See my FAQ posted on August 24, question 03-02, to get the address.) -- Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com) Certified T
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-09/msg00001.html (10,834 bytes)
- 2. Re: Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: "Gallerson,Charles,GLENDALE,Information Technology" <charles.gallerson AT US.NESTLE DOT COM>
- Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 02:20:34 -0700
- Thanks Mark !!!!! THANKS crg Yes. Read the 5.1 Administrator's Guide. It is available on the 'Net. (See my FAQ posted on August 24, question 03-02, to get the address.) -- Mark Stapleton (stapleton A
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-09/msg00009.html (11,171 bytes)
- 3. Re: Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: Christo Heuer <christoh AT ABSA.CO DOT ZA>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:06:50 +0200
- Hi All, Netware restores suck big time when it comes to throughput! The TSA/SMDR modules are single threaded (as far as CPU's are concerned - even in Netware 6). The best we could pusk the Netware cl
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-09/msg00016.html (14,153 bytes)
- 4. Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: "Cahill, Ricky" <Ricky.Cahill AT EQUITAS.CO DOT UK>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:22:23 +0100
- I'm trying to find some figures to get an idea if the performance I'm getting on restores is correct or I have a problem. Config is:- Storagetek L180 Library with 8xDLT7000 drives Connected to the TS
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-08/msg00986.html (12,439 bytes)
- 5. Re: Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:59:58 +0200
- Hi, you could try to manually do the restores per filespace. This would mean al lot more work from you, but you get at least the performance of 8 tapedrives (maybe build a script to do so?) Alternati
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-08/msg01003.html (14,128 bytes)
- 6. Re: Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: "Cahill, Ricky" <Ricky.Cahill AT EQUITAS.CO DOT UK>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:00:36 +0100
- If I was restoring just a single server from a small disaster onsite I'd definatly restore individual base directories in the volume to get more drives working on the problem. I'll try benchmarking w
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-08/msg01044.html (16,442 bytes)
- 7. Re: Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: Remco Post <r.post AT SARA DOT NL>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:30:24 +0200
- I'm about to upgrade to 7 LTO drives and fibre (so will have the same at the dr site) but from what I can see what I'll gain with the faster drives I'll lose from increased tape contention with the
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-08/msg01048.html (12,592 bytes)
- 8. Re: Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Stapleton <stapleto AT BERBEE DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:12:35 -0500
- You're fighting an uphill battle on two different fronts. DLTs are relatively slow tapes in terms of throughput, and they are devilishly slow on mounts and dismounts. *AND* NetWare's TSA module (whic
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-08/msg01363.html (12,518 bytes)
- 9. Re: Restore Performance. (score: 1)
- Author: "Gallerson,Charles,GLENDALE,Information Technology" <charles.gallerson AT US.NESTLE DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:28:31 -0700
- Mark, Does TSM 5.1.0.0 provide MOVE NODEDATA and multithreaded restores You're fighting an uphill battle on two different fronts. DLTs are relatively slow tapes in terms of throughput, and they are d
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2002-08/msg01371.html (12,954 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu